Introduction to a Human Design System dogma

The Human Design System is synthetic knowledge. A synthesis is able to integrate forms of knowledge that had before been thought unrelated or unreconcilable. With a shared linguistic background we are better able to comprehend what speakers and writers communicate. But we live in what The Kids call Babble-On. No two white Americans can be sure they understand each other. But those who have the experience of listening to any preacher/teacher/guru know what it's like to one day suddenly grasp the rhetoric and so join in a shared experience with the others who claim to comprehend. We will never transcend our human need to understand communication clearly. My research suggest to me that The Human Design System is the Pure Language of prophecy by which Homo sapiens may at last be able to understand themselves and each other in "real time" and work together to clean up the happy mess we call Religion. But we are brought to a moment of irony in our deconstruction of the word. Just when people were beginning to think "No Meta narrative" we are faced with a way to structure our knowledge, not to say something completely new but to experience the completion of the so called problems with the conceptual realm.

We live in the age of the possibility of a Theory of Everything (TOE) that has been going on since 1615. But there is no theory of everything but "God" - and that doesn't count anymore than "Nothing" and "The Universe" count as concepts we can actually comprehend. If everything is God, so what? We are back to Nothing and The Universe in our understanding, since, as we shall argue, God is not a legitimate category of Knowable Knowledge. If the universe is God we still don't know what the universe is. But I speak as a Monotheist. A Monotheist is someone who can tolerate the thinking of an Atheist, but argues (emotionally) with Believers about their idea that they think they know God. But let me tell you a wonderful secret apropos to our time. The good news from Religion is that Religion comes to an end and all is well that ends.

The Patriarchy and Religion are the same thing: a male oriented issue with a short term possibility. I am making the argument that Religion is the one thing we can resolve and overcome. Religion is "the problem we can overcome". But Homo sapiens do not get to move beyond the issues of Religion. What we do get to experience is the completion and celebration inherent to the nature of Religion. When these male oriented concepts are comprehended among us there will be no need to cling to them further. Something else can happen by way of mutation that is not what we are as human beings, though our striving reveals the hope of continuity. Whatever Human is, it has a time frame in which to be what it is.

So the point here is that while we never comprehend One we may approach One by way of Ten. There may be Ten interrelated concepts by which we may comprehend our human situation and experience the completion of our human issues. At the outset it must be said that no single Religion is in a position to claim superiority over the other nine Revelations. (Humility, like arrogance, is a human quality we do not overcome but in understanding.)

It has been pointed our that human knowledge comes in three forms: Revelation, Invention, and Discovery. Revelation pertains to Religious issues primarily. Whatever we think about Human, one of their qualities is that they tend to seek meaning, and meaning just is a Religious thing. Evolution has no meaning. But Homo sapiens have a tendency to impose some kind of meaning - even post modernism that defies meta narrative is a kind of meaning coming out of Discovery. But this won't work. Without an interesting story, as we shall see, Homo sapiens are not emotionally resonant with their nature. What I will argue here is that The Human Design System (HDS) provides an innovative linguistic matrix capable of integrating the peculiar issues of Religion in such a complete way that we may recognize our transcendence of the chemically loaded issue of Blame. And Blame is itself the negative seed inherent to Religion that we a destined to overcome as an interpersonal problem among us. Where there is the affirmation of NO BLAME those beings live in the transcendent experience of Homo sapiens completion. Where there is blame the world gets profoundly complicated and the issues of The Maya/The World become entrenched and reified, so passing on that negative retro virus as a burden to resolve. Let us agree to call blame: The Enemy, The Devil, and the very original sin we are destined to wrestle with and hopefully overcome. For this we need good information. It is necessary to hear the word that sets you free. But how can they hear without a preacher?

It is important to recognize that The Patriarchy as Religion is not about the feminine or the goddess or children. It's about how any Man thinks and acts in reaction to the words that he hears. It seems to be the time for Homo sapiens to enjoy the overcoming of these "ancient" (for us!) problems just in time so The Kids can experience a workable world and a new mutation. Consider that blame is really a chemical burden that literally holds us down to our condition. When the psyche is free of the burden of blame, that is a new experience of being Homo sapiens. And that liberation will bring with it all the fantasies we imagine about a return to Paradise, Shamballah, and the meaning of Peace on Earth, good will toward men!

Understand, finally (by way of introduction), that I have refined each point (really a stage of prenatal development) to one simple concept. Each of these points represents an category of Religions issue/tissue tension. I am not saying that The HDS must be followed this way. A synthetic formula should be able to provide conceptual structure for whatever one's interest might be. I have always been fascinated by the problems of Religion and its conflicts. I want to know why representative of each Religion can become violently identified with their own path of ideology. What is this human tendency; and is there any defense for these extremes? So I am really seeking a rational defense for why Homo sapiens embrace Religion so tenaciously. I will be suggesting that our emotional identification with ideas has a genetic basis, and that we need only change the View to see that such dogmatic adherence is justified. In fact, whatever the resurrection is, which is the experience of Peace On Earth, it will not come about until Homo sapiens wants this experience like there is no tomorrow - like pornography and war! I myself have let go at the mental level. I no longer struggle with "choice" and "no limitation" and "free will" and "transcending the ego". I am not trying to "go to heaven when I die". I am not trying to "get enlightened". The dark has overwhelmed me and I am simply OK with who I am and with what happens when it does. I accept the mechanics of NO Choice and that Choice is simply the nature of this world, this illusion, this Maya, this dream, this story that ends. We live in a Biverse, after all. So here is my take on how to get over All the problems Religion has to offer.